Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay
Please post an overview of a current event dilemma (from the national news, local, national or international newspaper).
List the topic in the Subject
Clearly identify the dilemma and explain in what ways this is an ethical dilemma.
Which ethical principles are relevant to this event?
Are the principles in conflict? If so, which principle is more compelling in this particular case, and why?
In what ways might this primary principle suggest and offer support for a resolution? Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay
Does the distinction between consent and informed consent have implications for professional health care providers? If so, how? What role can the APRN have in education related to informed consent?
This article reports the views of Congressman Tom Price on abortion and other issues. Price is anti-abortion and advocates against abortion practices as well as funding by the taxpayer subsidies and consequently does not approve of contraceptives support by Obamacare Act (Howard & Tinker, 2017). Abortion is a controversial topic in the contemporary society with the debate surrounding the ethical and moral aspect of the practice. The ethical dilemma involves its perception as wrong as it involves killing and the view as right for health risky situations and financial instability reasons. Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay
Abortion dilemma in this event is associated with autonomy and non-maleficence principle. For instance, the antiabortion advocates consider sexual practices without contraceptives act as an agreement between the woman and the child. Since the mother is knowledge of the pregnancy possibility she is expected to give the fetus right to live and not decide on its behalf. Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay. On the other hand, autonomy allows the woman to decide on her body and therefore can choose to keep the fetus or not (Faúndes & Miranda, 2017). Non-maleficence principle guides against causing harm. Abortion causes death to the fetus as well as psychological and physiological impacts on the mother. However, safe abortions cause no harm to the mother and they facilitate health, financial and parental planning. This makes non-maleficence a more compelling principle in this particular case.
Non-maleficence offers resolution in that, it advocates for legal and safe abortions that intend to cause no harm to the woman. This will eventually help young sexually experimenting teenagers to pursue their education and professional dreams without the burden of raising kids at a young age (Badruddin., 2016). Informed consent expects the APRN to educate patients of the risks, benefits and alternatives associated with abortion. APRN’s role in consent is to ensure that the abortion client signs the legal documentation agreeing freely that they understand the practice (Ahmed, 2015). Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay
Ahmed, A. (2015). Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
Badruddin., S. (2016). Abortion and Ethics: Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics. Retrieved from https://www.longdom.org/open-access/abortion-and-ethics-2155-9627-1000291.pdf on September 9,2019
Faúndes, A., & Miranda, L. (2017). Ethics surrounding the provision of abortion care. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 43, 50-57.
Howard, J. & Tinker, B. (2017). Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues. CNN Health. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/18/health/tom-price-hhs-on-the-issues-profile-aca/index.html on September 9,2019 Tom Price, HHS nominee, on abortion, guns and other health issues Essay