Single payer healthcare system essay
Healthcare is an important need for any population. In addition, a good healthcare system would be judged as such only on the basis of its ability to provide good care to the population with the medical personnel feeling satisfied with their career choice. This would entail medical personnel not being overworked and poor patients getting care. Only a single-payer healthcare system would support efforts to achieve these goals by considering healthcare as a right and not a privilege (Galea, 2018). The present analysis offers arguments for a single payer healthcare system.
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Place your order now, we write everything from scratch
America currently makes use of a for-profit health care system. Under this system, many Americans are forced to visit medical facilities that they do not want to visit. In addition, many Americans are regularly compelled to visit specific medical facilities and stop going to facilities they have known for long and do not seek to leave. Owing to the fact that medical conditions can occasionally be complicated with several comorbidities, it is not surprising for patients to visit several physicians over time. Should the medical insurance conditions change, then this painstakingly constructed system of medical specialists is likely to collapse even as the patients are forced to leave their preferred physicians single payer healthcare system essay. The new physicians may not be as familiar with the medical conditions so that care is compromised. This revolving door is also harmful to medical personnel as patients incessantly come and go thereby fomenting alienation that causes burnout (Krahn, 2016).
The single payer healthcare system can help to address these concerns. Although questions could be asked about who would pay for the system, the reality is that the American government can pay without necessarily increasing taxes. Currently, the country is spending trillions of dollars to maintain close to 1,000 military bases across the world while fighting unnecessary wars. This money should instead be used on establishing a single payer healthcare system that would improve health care access (Galea, 2018). As a result, there is a need for America to adopt a single payer healthcare system that provide good care to the population with the medical personnel feeling satisfied with their career choice.
References
Galea, S. (2018). Healthier: Fifty Thoughts on the Foundations of Population Health. Oxford University Press.
Krahn, H. (2016). The Single Payer Healthcare System – Faults and Fixes. FriesenPress.
W7 Course Project Grading Rubric – 185 pts
W7 Course Project Grading Rubric – 185 pts
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose & Focus
10.0 pts
The writer has made insightful and mature decisions about focus, organization, and content to communicate clearly and effectively. The purpose and focus of the writing are clear to the reader and the organization and content are well chosen, sophisticated, and/or persuasive. Has a highly developed, defendable thesis that provides focus and direction to the essay.
8.5 pts
The writer has made good decisions about focus, organization, and content to communicate clearly and effectively. The purpose and focus of the writing are clear to the reader and the organization and content achieve the purpose as well. Has a clear recognizable thesis that provides focus and direction to the essay.
7.5 pts
The writer’s decisions about focus, organization, or content sometimes interfere with clear, effective communication. The purpose of the writing is not fully achieved. Thesis is unclear OR is not focused
6.0 pts
The writer’s decisions about focus, organization, or content interfere with communication. The purpose of the writing is not achieved. Lacks a clear thesis
0.0 pts
Completely unfocused and/or disorganized. Purpose of writing is not achieved. No recognizable thesis
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Research/Evidence
40.0 pts
Sources are scholarly or of very high substantive quality where subject matter requires and no scholarly reference will serve the purpose, but all are current, authoritative, and relevant to topic.
34.0 pts
Most sources are scholarly or of very high substantive quality where subject matter requires; but all are current, authoritative and relevant to topic.
30.0 pts
Sources are mostly substantive, even where subject matter does not require. All are relevant to the topic. One source outside of current range.
24.0 pts
Sources are substantive, even though scholarly sources are available and relevaant. Only one scholarly source. All are relevant to the topic. More than one source outside of current range.
0.0 pts
Popular sources only and are not, therefore, authoritative, OR sources are not current, OR sources are not relevant
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning
45.0 pts
Substantial and well-reasoned development of ideas. All key assumptions are made explicit. Credible evidence is germane, and accurately analyzed and fair- mindedly interpreted. Displays strong critical thinking skills and habits of mind.
38.25 pts
Offers solid reasoning. Most key assumptions are recognized or made explicit. Most inferences are accurate, most examples are on point.
33.75 pts
Offers some supporting evidence. The case includes some examples that are too general, not interpreted, or not clearly relevant to thesis.
27.0 pts
Offers simplistic, underdeveloped, circular, or irrelevant arguments.
single payer healthcare system essay
0.0 pts
Includes fallacies, exaggerations, faulty reasoning, factual errors, biased statements, etc.
45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
30.0 pts
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs flow smoothly and coherently throughout the paper. The writer shows clear effort to assist the reader in following the logic of the ideas expressed. Develops a complete reasoning pathway that contains logical follow through, considers multiple points of view,and examines assumptions.
25.5 pts
Sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points coherent and easy to follow. Develops a logical reasoning pathway with minor gaps or leaps while addressing other points of view.
22.5 pts
Sentence structure and/ or word choice sometimes interfere with clarity and coherence. Needs to improve sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs to make the writing easy to follow May contain some gaps in reasoning pathway; deals minimally with other points of view.
18.0 pts
Ineffective sentence structure, word choice, transitions, and/ or sequencing of ideas make reading and understanding difficult. Contains gaps and/or leaps in development and does not examine other points of view.
0.0 pts
Disorganized; little or no sequencing of ideas; awkward and ineffective sentence structure; reading and understanding extremely difficult Undeveloped and/or does not examine other points of view.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Tone
20.0 pts
Maintains objective and professional tone; uses professional vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates a distinct and engaging voice, tone, and level of formality appropriate to audience, purpose, and genre.
17.0 pts
Uses objective and professional vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates a consistent voice, tone, and level of formality appropriate to audience, purpose, and genre.
15.0 pts
Some informality in vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates an inconsistent voice, tone, or formality level that is occasionally inappropriate to the situation.
12.0 pts
The use of words, sentences, and punctuation shows a lack of awareness of the voice, tone, and formality level expected in academic writing.
0.0 pts
Informal; uses slang or colloquialisms; fails to achieve tone and level of formality expected in academic writing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Punctuation, Spelling, Capitalization
5.0 pts
Virtually free of punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.
4.0 pts
Occasional punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.
3.0 pts
Many punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Interfere with meaning in some places.
2.0 pts
Punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors that hinder communication.
0.0 pts
Severe punctuation, spelling and capitalization errors.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Sentence Structure
single payer healthcare system essay
10.0 pts
Sentence structure is complex and powerful. The writer has used vivid, purposefully crafted, and varied sentence styles and lengths.
8.5 pts
Sentences are effective and varied in style and length.
7.5 pts
Sentences show limited variety in sentence style and length.
6.0 pts
Sentence structure is simple, without variety in sentence style and length.
0.0 pts
Sentence structures are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Word Choice
10.0 pts
The writer displays a broad range of vocabulary, with effective, accurate, and contextually appropriate word usage.
8.5 pts
The writer displays a satisfactory range of vocabulary and accurate and appropriate word usage.
7.5 pts
The writer displays some varied word choice but language is mostly vague and needs more accuracy to properly convey ideas. Some errors of diction and usage are evident but do not interfere significantly with readability.
6.0 pts
The writer displays a limited range of vocabulary. Errors of diction and usage are evident and begin to interfere significantly with readability.
0.0 pts
Limited vocabulary. Diction and syntax errors are evident and impede a clear reading of the text.
10.0 pts
single payer healthcare system essay
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10.0 pts
Intext and reference citations in correct APA format with no errors.
8.5 pts
Intext and reference citations in correct APA format with only occasional minor error.
7.5 pts
Interfere with meaning in some places. Some major errors in APA format for intext, reference citations.
6.0 pts
The writer does not use APA format, presentation, or style (citations) for the assignment or APA formatting has many major errors.
0.0 pts
No intext citations to sources and/or no list of references in APA format
10.0 pts
single payer healthcare system essay