1
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Learner’s Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX6610: Introduction to Care Coordination
Instructor Name
August 1, 2019
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
2
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
A comprehensive health needs assessment of patients enables health care providers to
systematically use their resources to disperse care efficiently. In this paper, a comprehensive
needs assessment of a simulated patient is discussed to highlight the importance of
comprehensive needs assessments in identifying and reducing gaps in patient care and
implementing effective care coordination. This paper discusses the various dimensions of a
patient’s needs and the strategies to extract relevant patient information to understand these
needs to establish the significance of a health needs assessment. This paper also presents
effective evidence-based practices in care coordination and the importance of a multidisciplinary
approach to patient care for improving health care outcomes.
Current Gaps in Mr. Decker’s Care
Mr. Decker is a 79-year-old diabetic patient readmitted to one of Vila Health’s hospitals.
Initially admitted with a badly infected toe, Mr. Decker’s inability to adhere to medical
instructions after discharge has resulted in him being readmitted with sepsis. Mr. Decker’s
readmission can be attributed to the following gaps in care:
• Lack of an interdisciplinary approach to care: The inability of the health care provider to
ensure that factors such as diabetes and aging are given due consideration while dispersing
care
• Failure to ensure adequate post-discharge support: Lack of adequate efforts from the care
provider to ensure that the patient effectively carries out the post-discharge care instructions
• Lack of consideration for the patient’s financial standing: The patient’s poor financial
standing was not considered during the design and management of the patient’s care
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
3
To ensure that Mr. Decker’s physiological, social, religious, and psychological needs are
effectively addressed, the needs assessment tool adopted is the Patient Centered Assessment
Method. The method is an integrated needs assessment tool that assesses patients’ physical,
social, psychological, and mental well-being needs. The tool was selected because it is action
oriented. It facilitates the addressal of patients’ holistic needs, expanding beyond the realm of
physiological health care to address their psychosocial needs (Maxwell et al., 2018).
Informational Needs for Patient’s Optimal Care:
An effective assessment of Mr. Decker’s current care needs depends on the following
types of information:
• Mr. Decker’s clinical information, namely age, allergies, weight, current diagnosis, and
medical history (Kelley et al., 2013)
• Personal information such as his schedules, preferences, typical behaviors, and interests,
which will provide clarity on how Mr. Decker’s care needs are to be addressed (Kelley et al.,
2013)
Strategy for Gathering Additional Necessary Assessment Data
As a personal interview does not help gather all the information necessary for the
adequate delivery of care, the following data collection strategies are formulated:
• Thoroughly scanning Mr. Decker’s activities across social media platforms to collect
information about his behavior patterns, his daily routines, and the significant events he has
been a part of will help provide clarity on his personalized needs and the various interrelated
factors affecting his care.
• In-depth interviews with close relatives and friends about Mr. Decker’s habits, nature, and
recent activities will help understand the factors that affect care and facilitate personalized
care measures that suit his situation. Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
4
• The electronic health record systems at Mr. Decker’s preceding health care providers are
important sources of clinical information. Health information exchange systems are set up to
access Mr. Decker’s longitudinal clinical data from different health care providers to get
clarity on the various factors such as diabetes and aging that have a bearing on his current
condition. The clinical history will help ensure that Mr. Decker’s care addresses these
interrelated factors and facilitates a holistic treatment.
Societal, Economic, and Interdisciplinary Factors Affecting Patient Care
The factors affecting Mr. Decker’s health care outcomes are the following:
• Aging: The physiological changes that occur in an aging person present immense challenges
in the diagnosis, treatment, and recovery of geriatric patients (above 60 years of age) with
sepsis. Geriatric patients usually show atypical, non-specific symptoms such as altered
mental status, lethargy, dehydration, loss of appetite, and weakness, making the diagnosis
challenging. Being an inflammatory consequence to an infection, sepsis is conventionally
diagnosed using systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, which are not normally
met by geriatric patients. According to Clifford et al. (2016), geriatric patients undergo
pharmacokinetic changes, namely degeneration in the ability to absorb, metabolize,
distribute, and eliminate drugs. These pharmacokinetic changes have significant implications
on the treatment of sepsis and, consequently, result in the need for special considerations
while treating geriatric patients. Also, geriatric adults usually witness immunosenescence
(changes in the immune system), which impedes the swiftness of the recovery process
in geriatric patients (Clifford et al., 2016).
• Financing for health care: Mr. Decker is a 79-year-old man whose accessibility to health care
depends primarily on Medicare, the national insurance health care program. Although
Medicare covers hospitalization and medical insurance, the level of care depends on the type
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
5
of insurance plan opted. The 2019 cost estimates for Medicare stand at 437 U.S. dollars as
the premium per month for the hospital insurance plan (Part A) and 135.50 U.S. dollars as
the premium per month for the medical insurance plan (Part B), with higher costs for other
high-end plans (U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, n.d.). Mr. Decker’s dismal
income status has affected the nature of the Medicare plan he could afford, thus impacting
care outcomes.
• Social support: Mr. Decker has limited social support in the form of an aged wife who lives
with him, a daughter who visits them occasionally, and his nephew and nephew’s wife, who
offer occasional assistance. This limited social support has had a significant bearing on his
ability to carry out the care instructions laid out by the care providers. Many studies provide
evidence about the impact of social support on health outcomes. In a study by Schöllgen et
al. (2011), the participants interviewed reported that increased social support was associated
with functional and subjective improvements in health (as cited in Rapoza et al., 2016). A
study conducted by White et al. (2009) found that geriatric adults with insufficient social
support reported poorer health outcomes than geriatric adults who were satisfied with their
present social support (as cited in Rapoza et al., 2016). The inadequacy of social support in
Mr. Decker’s case has been the basis for the worsening of his health condition from a simple
toe wound to sepsis.
• Diabetes: The fact that Mr. Decker is also diabetic has impacted his care by making him
vulnerable to contracting infections at a higher rate and facing increased chances of
prolonged mortality as a result of sepsis. This can be substantiated by the fact that diabetes
causes a decline in the functioning of a patient’s immune cells, diminishing the ability to
clear bacterial formations and increasing infection complications (Frydrych et al., 2017).
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
6
Relating Patient Care and Care Coordination Outcomes to Professional Standards
The outcomes of patient care and care coordination can be accounted for by measuring
the patient safety and quality outcomes of patient care and care coordination. Patient safety
outcomes for specific patient care coordination are measured against the standards laid out in the
National Quality Forum’s safety report for 2017 and The Joint Commission’s National Patient
Safety Goals for 2019. The rationale for measuring safety outcomes based on the National
Quality Forum’s safety report is the comprehensiveness of the report and the credibility of the
forum, whose primary focus is the development of safety measures (National Quality Forum,
n.d.). The rationale for selecting The Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals as a
standard for patient safety is that the goals are developed based on the suggestions of a highly
interdisciplinary advisory group and the analysis of national sentinel event data (Armstrong,
2014). The quality outcomes of care coordination will be measured using the Care Coordination
and Transition Management Logic Model for registered nurses as the standard (Haas & Swan,
2014a). The rationale is that the logic model not only lays out care coordination quality outcomes
but also offers holistic linkages between nurse competencies, care coordination, and outcomes
(Haas & Swan, 2014b). Also, the logic model offers an innovative approach for interprofessional
teams focusing on patient-centered care (Haas & Swan, 2014a).
The Joint Commission annually releases patient safety goals, which have been deemed
nationally as qualitative standards for patient safety. Some significant standards for patient safety
are identification of a patient by both name and date of birth, dispersal of the right test results to
the right patient, accurate labeling of medicines, medical device alarms going off in real time,
and ensuring infection prevention, which will set the right benchmark for ensuring effective
patient safety outcomes (The Joint Commission, 2019). In terms of The Joint Commission’s
standards for patient safety, the care to Mr. Decker was characterized by 100% infection
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
7
prevention during acute care, accurate administration of medicines with no adverse effect on the
body, and a successful operation without any complication. Some important care coordination
quality outcomes defined by the Care Coordination and Transition Management Logic Model are
the needs assessment’s taking into account patient needs, preferences, and goals; transmission of
the patient’s care plan with zero errors; constant updating of care coordination plans; evidence-
based practices’ achieving treatment outcomes of 80%; and optimal understanding of the
interdisciplinary roles between team members (Haas & Swan, 2014b). On this front, the specific
patient care coordination witnessed 70% treatment outcomes, the patient’s care plan was able to
accommodate 90% of the patient’s needs and preferences, and the care plan was updated in a
timely manner with zero issues reported within the cross disciplinary team.
Evidence-Based Practices for Successful Implementation of Patient Care Coordination
The following evidence-based practices have been identified to be effective in
implementing successful care coordination for patients with sepsis:
• GENeralized Early Sepsis Intervention Strategies (GENESIS) is an initiative launched for
the continuous improvement of the quality of care for patients with sepsis. GENESIS is a
comprehensive program with highly pertinent treatment measures such as implementing
institutional assessments for the prevalence of sepsis and mortality, identifying sepsis emergencies,
executing 6-hour sepsis bundle interventions via highly coordinated sepsis teams, and implementing
feedback. In their study on the impact of GENESIS on a treatment group of 4,801 patients, Cannon
et al. (2012) found an average in-hospital mortality reduction of 14% and a reduction in the duration
of stay of 5.1 days in comparison to patient groups that did not receive treatment under GENESIS
(as cited in Perez, 2015).
• Another effective practice can be the adoption of a centrally coordinated, multifaceted
quality improvement program implemented by many hospitals in Brazil (Noritomi et al.,
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
8
2014). Noritomi et al. (2014), in their study of 10 private hospitals implementing the
program, found the initiative to include two phases. The first phase comprised establishing a
local committee, setting up a screening procedure for the early detection of sepsis, carrying
out proven treatments, establishing guidelines for empirical-based antimicrobial therapy,
formulating specific routines for swift laboratory sampling, and establishing routines to
enable the efficient administration of antibiotics. The second phase included the collection
of data and creation of reports on the rate of compliance and mortality in line with the
benchmarks set by the hospital. This practice is a promising one to adopt as Noritomi et al.
(2014) found that the studied hospitals showed a decrease in mortality rates from 55%
before the implementation of program to 26% after the implementation of the program.
Best Practices from the Perspective of Population Health on Patient Outcomes
From the population standpoint of improving the health outcomes of geriatric patients
with sepsis, the following care practices are found to be credible and effective:
• As geriatric patients show atypical, nonspecific symptoms (Clifford et al., 2016), a study by
Singer et al. (2016) found the sequential organ failure assessment score a valuable tool in
determining signs of organ disfunction and mortality and, thus, helpful in the diagnosis of
sepsis. Singer et al. (2016) found that the sequential organ failure assessment score has
widespread familiarity in the clinical care community and serves as an acceptable marker for
mortality risks.
• The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, which are widely accepted, formulate the Sepsis
Six bundle as a best practice for the treatment of sepsis (Lat et al., 2018). Hancock (2015)
describes the Sepsis Six bundle as an early intervention program that calls for each patient to
receive three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to treatment within the hour of
recognition of the health condition (as cited in Lat et al., 2018).
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
9
Benefits of Multidisciplinary Approach to Patient Care
Mr. Decker is an old patient with multiple diagnoses and several complex and multiple
needs. A multidisciplinary approach to health care through effective consultation and
collaboration involving Mr. Decker, family support, and interdisciplinary teams serves as the
only approach that can address the complex multimorbidity, social issues, and psychological
issues faced by him (Department of Health & Human Services, n.d.). This multidisciplinary
approach to patient care can also reduce the gaps due to societal, economic, and interprofessional
factors. The approach is built on egalitarian-based collaboration between interdisciplinary teams
that helps break the hierarchy existing in traditional health care organizations and, thus, improves
the satisfaction of employees in the workplace (Hughes, 2018).
The adoption of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care ensures improved patient
outcomes. In their study on improving operating room efficiency, Oyderk et al. (1988) found
that the adoption of multidisciplinary operating room teams improved turnover time by 16
minutes and considerably decreased delays when compared with operating room teams that are
not multidisciplinary, resulting in reduced hospitalization costs (as cited in Epstein, 2014). This
study supports the argument that a multidisciplinary approach to patient care helps reduce the
duration of stay, reduce hospitalization costs, and improve patient satisfaction.
Conclusion
A comprehensive needs assessment of patient care is presented in this paper through the
case of Mr. Decker. This paper successfully identifies the various interrelated factors, such as
aging, diabetes, social support, and financial conditions, that need to be addressed for a patient to
achieve optimal care. The studies presented in the paper have identified credible standards for
the specific care coordination outcomes to draw measures from. This paper successfully
identifies holistic and judicious evidence-based practices for managing sepsis. Finally, a strong
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
10
case for a multidisciplinary approach to care coordination is presented with empirical evidence.
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
11
References
Armstrong, G. (2014). Nursing and quality: A historical perspective. In G. Lamb (Ed.), Care
coordination: The game changer: How nursing is revolutionizing quality care (pp. 13–
28).
http://library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&
db=nlebk&AN=719342&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_17
Clifford, K. M., Dy-Boarman, E. A., Haase, K. K., Maxvill, K. H., Pass, S., & Alvarez, C. A.
(2016). Challenges with diagnosing and managing sepsis in older adults. Expert Review
of Anti-Infective Therapy, 14(2), 231–241.
https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2016.1135052
Department of Health & Human Services. (n.d.). An interdisciplinary approach to caring.
https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/patient-care/older-
people/resources/improving-access/ia-interdisciplinary
Epstein, N. E. (2014). Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review.
Surgical Neurology International, 5(Suppl 7), S295–S303.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.139612
Frydrych, L. M., Fattahi, F., He, K., Ward, P. A., & Delano, M. J. (2017). Diabetes and sepsis:
Risk, recurrence, and ruination. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 8(271), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00271
Haas, S. A., & Swan, B. A. (2014a). Developing the value proposition for registered nurse
care coordination and transition management role in ambulatory care settings. Nursing
Economic$, 32(2), 70–79. https://ecommons.luc.edu/nursing_facpubs/11/
Haas, S. A., & Swan, B. A. (2014b). Quality and safety outcomes for patients and families. In G.
Lamb (Ed.), Care coordination: The game changer: How nursing is revolutionizing
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
12
quality care (pp. 133–152).
http://library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&d
b=nlebk&AN=719342&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_17
Hughes, C. (2018, July 12). Multidisciplinary teamwork ensures better healthcare outcomes.
https://www.td.org/insights/multidisciplinary-teamwork-ensures-better-
healthcare-outcomes
Kelley, T., Docherty, S., & Brandon, D. (2013). Information needed to support knowing the
patient. Advances in Nursing Science, 36(4), 351–363.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000006
Lat, S., Mashlan, W., Heffey, S., & Jones, B. (2018). Recognition and clinical management of
sepsis in frail older people. Nursing Older People, 30(2), 35–38.
http://doi.org/10.7748/nop.2018.e975
Maxwell, M., Hibberd, C., Aitchison, P., Calveley, P., Pratt, R., Dougall, N., Hoy, C., . . .
Cameron, I. (2018). The Patient Centered Assessment Method for improving nurse-led
biopsychosocial assessment of patients with long-term conditions: A feasibility RCT.
Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06040
National Quality Forum. (n.d.). Patient safety.
http://www.qualityforum.org/Show_Content.aspx?id=57035
Noritomi, D. T., Ranzani, O. T., Monteiro, M. B., Ferreira, E. M., Santos,
S. R., Leibel, F., & Machado, F. R. (2014). Implementation of a
multifaceted sepsis education program in an emerging country
setting: Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a long-term
follow- up study. Intensive Care Medicine, 40(2), 182–191.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3131-5
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
13
Perez, D. (2015). An evidence based approach to sepsis: Educational program (Doctoral
project). ProQuest. (Order No. 10014646) http://doi.org/10.34917/8220151
Rapoza, K. A., Vassell, K., Wilson, D. T., Robertson, T. W., Manzella, D. J., Ortiz-Garcia, A. L.,
& Jimenez-Lazar, L. A. (2016). Attachment as a moderating factor between social
support, physical health, and psychological symptoms. SAGE Open, 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682818
Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., . . .
Angus, D. C. (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic
shock (Sepsis-3). Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(8), 801–810.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
The Joint Commission. (2019). National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 2019.
https://jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_Chapter_HAP_Jan2019.pdf
U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Medicare costs at a glance.
https://medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/medicare-costs-at-a-glance
Copyright ©2019 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.
- Comprehensive Needs Assessment
- Learner’s Name
- Capella University
- NURS-FPX6610: Introduction to Care Coordination
- Instructor Name
- August 1, 2019
- Current Gaps in Mr. Decker’s Care
- Informational Needs for Patient’s Optimal Care:
- Strategy for Gathering Additional Necessary Assessment Data
- Societal, Economic, and Interdisciplinary Factors Affecting Patient Care
- Relating Patient Care and Care Coordination Outcomes to Professional Standards
- Evidence-Based Practices for Successful Implementation of Patient Care Coordination
- Best Practices from the Perspective of Population Health on Patient Outcomes
- Benefits of Multidisciplinary Approach to Patient Care
- Conclusion