NURS 6501 Module 1 Assignment Case Study Analysis

NURS 6501 Module 1 Assignment Case Study Analysis

Case Study Analysis

A 42-year old male comes into the emergency presenting with the following symptoms: a fever of 100.6˚ F, chills and a swollen leg with redness. The patient describes that he was working in his yard when his string trimmer slipped and cut his leg. The patient cleaned the wound with water from his garden hose and covered the wound with a Band-aid. The purpose of this review is to explore why the patient might have the symptoms described, which genes are associated with the development of the disease and provide a description of the immunosuppression process, including its effect on normal body function and systems.

BUY PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
The patient may be presenting the symptoms due to the development of an infection on the cut. An infected cut normally develops after germs get into the sensitive tissue beneath the skin via a damaged area of the skin. An infection may develop at any point between 2-3 days until the cut visibly heals (Healthline.com Editor, 2019). An uninfected cut will normally improve until it is completely healed, whereas an infected cut is likely to become more painful. Moreover, infected cuts usually have red surrounding skin and the patient may feel hot. Additionally, the patient may notice swelling around the infected area and progressed infections usually begin to ooze pus (Healthline.com Editor, 2019). A patient presenting these symptoms is advised to seek immediate medical attention because they demonstrate that the infection has spread. NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis

Research has found that the wound healing process is dependent on genetic makeup (Gross, 1996). This is because higher organisms can respond to tissue injury by either wound repair or regeneration (Gross, 1996). Research to identify the genetic loci in the wound closure process found that the traits were contained in chromosomes 8, 12 and 15 as well as two separate locations on the chromosome 13 (McBrearty, Clark, Zhang, Blankenhorn, & Heber-Katz, 1998). On the other hand, genetic control for the healing process was a function of the chromosome 7 (McBrearty, Clark, Zhang, Blankenhorn, & Heber-Katz, 1998). Thus, the mammalian genes controlled the healing and regeneration process in mammals.

Immunosuppression describes the ability to induce a lower level of immune system activation and efficacy (Pellegrino & Mancini, 2016). Immunosuppression may occur as a system function or as an adverse reaction to the treatment of another condition. For instance, immunosuppression may be performed to reduce the body’s possibility for rejecting an organ transplant (Pellegrino & Mancini, 2016). Immunosuppression may also be used to treat conditions where the immune system is overreacting, in the case of allergies and autoimmune diseases such as infections. Immunosuppression from pre-existing diseases such as HIV or ongoing cancer treatment could lead to higher risks of getting an infection from a cut. A weakened immune system is one of the environmental and health risk factors for getting an infection from a cut. Whether an individual is undergoing deliberate immunosuppression due to an organ transplant or are undergoing radiation therapy or non-deliberate immunosuppression due to chronic illness, then an individual is more susceptible to autoimmune diseases such as infections.

In conclusion, the case study has demonstrated that the patient may have experienced an infected cut from his incident during gardening. The infected cut will normally present similar symptoms. Moreover, the genetic aspect of wound healing and regeneration is derived from literature and the influence of immunosuppression on healing responses is also explored. By considering these factors, the healthcare practitioner will be able to diagnose and treat the infection.

References

Gross, J. (1996). Getting to mammalian wound repair and amphibian limb regeneration: a mechanistic link in the early events. Wound repair and regeneration, 4(2), 190-202.

Healthline.com Editor. (2019). How to Identify and Treat an Infected Cut. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from Healthline.com: https://www.healthline.com/health/infected-cut

McBrearty, B. A., Clark, L. D., Zhang, X. M., Blankenhorn, E. P., & Heber-Katz, E. (1998). Genetic analysis of a mammalian wound-healing trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(20), 11792-11797.

Pellegrino, B., & Mancini, M. C. (2016). Immunosuppression. Retrieved from emedicine.medscape.com: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/432316-overview NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis

Module 1 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Hero Images

An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify cell, gene, and/or process elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:

Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.
Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis
Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2.

Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Module 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Module 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS_6501_Module1_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:
Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis

The response includes reasons for the symptoms, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.

The response does not include reasons for the symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing.
Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition.
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition. NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition, or the analysis is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. NURS 6501 Module 1 assignment Case Study Analysis Total Points: 100

Scroll to Top