2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 1/4
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Conduct a review of literature relevant to the case you selected and the goals you developed in Week 5. Locate a minimum of six full-text research articles to use in your literature review.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
Six appropriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed clearly with speci�c detail regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
Six appropriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed with some detail regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Three approriate articles are researched, and one research goal and one viewpoint are identi�ed with details regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected model that are vague, inaccurate, or omitted.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) Fewer than three articles are researched, and/or articles are inappropriate. Research goals, viewpoints, or details regarding how system implementation evaluations researched are similar to the selected are vague, incomplete, or missing.
Name: NURS_6541_Week6_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 2/4
Excellent Good Fair Poor
In a 2- to 3-page paper:
Synthesize the �ndings in the literature as they relate to the case you selected and goals you developed in Week 5.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail synthesizes six research articles as they relate to the selected case and goals developed.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response synthesizes six research articles as they relate to the selected case and goals developed.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response synthesizes three research articles with vague or inaccurate details regarding how they relate to the selected case and goals developed.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response synthesizes fewer than three research articles, and/or provides vague, incomplete, or inaccurate details regarding how they relate to the selected case and goals developed.
Explain the original conclusions that you derived from the evidence you gathered.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail explains the original conclusions derived from the evidence you gathered.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response explains the original conclusions derived from the evidence you gathered.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response explains with vague or inaccurate details the original conclusions derived from the evidence you gathered.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response explains with vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete details the original conclusions derived from the evidence you gathered.
Support your synthesis and conclusions using evidence from the literature.
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail supports the synthesis and conclusions using evidence from the literature.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The response supports the synthesis and conclusions using evidence from the literature.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The response supports the synthesis and conclusions in a vague or inaccurate manner and/or fails to appropriately apply evidence from the literature.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The response supports the synthesis and conclusions in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner and/or fails to apply evidence from the literature.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 3/4
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 4/4 Excellent Good Fair Poor Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6541_Week6_Assignment_Rubric EXIT